Geographic Differentials in the U.S.

Results from recent Pulse Survey
Geographic Differentials in the U.S.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

There’s long been two primary compensation approaches for geographically disbursed work locations in the U.S. One, a national salary structure, in which pay is treated the same with no relation to location, or two, the application of a method to differentiate pay across locations by cost of labor or cost of living differences.

With the recent proliferation of work from anywhere schemes causing a more distributed workforce than ever before, the debate over which approach to use has intensified and grown into a larger discussion about pay philosophy in the U.S. Should companies pay employees based on location, rather than focus on the job role without consideration for location? If an employee moves to a lower cost location should the pay be decreased?

AIRINC’s recent survey explores how companies are grappling with this issue and what the future of compensation might look like in the U.S.

Download complete survey results

Please sign in or register for FREE

Sign in OR sign up to become a registered The Forum for Expatriate Management website user
Subscribe here